Skip to content
project banner

QSIR Practitioner Aardvark Cohort - Day 1-

We would like to thank you for completing the evaluation form for our QSIR programme.

We are keen to capture your feedback on each of the sessions from today, as well as the overall impression of the workshop day. Your responses will remain anonymous and be collated to inform programme delivery. Data may be reported and/or published in aggregate. Please place your completed questionnaire in the appropriate box at the end of the day.

Many thanks for your help.

1.  

Five star  factors in leading improvement

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

2.  

Five star  factors in leading improvement

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

3.  

Five star  factors in leading improvement

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

4.  

Defining your aim

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

5.  

Defining your aim

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

6.  

Defining your aim

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

7.  

Tools and techniques for effective project management

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

8.  

Tools and techniques for effective project management

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

9.  

Tools and techniques for effective project management

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

10.  

Fishbone diagram

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

11.  

Fishbone diagram

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

12.  

Fishbone diagram

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

13.  

Pareto principle

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

14.  

Pareto principle

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

15.  

Pareto principle

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

16.  

Using driver diagrams

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

17.  

Using driver diagrams

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

18.  

Using driver diagrams

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

21.  

How would you rate the value of the content of the workshop day?

22.  

How would you rate the structure of the workshop day? (PowerPoint, exercises, discussions)

Maximum 255 characters

0/255

Thank you for completing the form