Skip to content
project banner

QSIR Practitioner Aardvark Cohort - Day 2

We would like to thank you for completing the evaluation form for our QSIR programme.

We are keen to capture your feedback on each of the sessions from today, as well as the overall impression of the workshop day. Your responses will remain anonymous and be collated to inform programme delivery. Data may be reported and/or published in aggregate. Please place your completed questionnaire in the appropriate box at the end of the day.

Many thanks for your help.

1.  

Introduction to measurement

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

2.  

Introduction to measurement

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

3.  

Introduction to measurement

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

4.  

How do we use Measurement in the NHS?

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

5.  

How do we use Measurement in the NHS?

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

6.  

How do we use Measurement in the NHS?

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

7.  

How is variation relevant to improvement

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

8.  

How is variation relevant to improvement

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

9.  

How is variation relevant to improvement

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

10.  

Analysing variation using run charts

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

11.  

Analysing variation using run charts

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

12.  

Analysing variation using run charts

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

13.  

Analysing variation using control charts

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

14.  

Analysing variation using control charts

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

15.  

Analysing variation using control charts

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

16.  

Measurement and the model for improvement

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

17.  

Measurement and the model for improvement

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

18.  

Measurement and the model for improvement

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

19.  

Defining our measures

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

20.  

Defining our measures

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

21.  

Defining our measures

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

22.  

Using Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA cycles)

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

23.  

Using Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA cycles)

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

24.  

Using Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA cycles)

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

27.  

How would you rate the value of the content of the workshop day?

28.  

How would you rate the structure of the workshop day? (PowerPoint, exercises, discussions)

Maximum 255 characters

0/255

Thank you for completing the form