Skip to content
project banner

QSIR Practitioner Wolf Cohort - Day 4

We would like to thank you for completing the evaluation form for our QSIR programme.

We are keen to capture your feedback on each of the sessions from today, as well as the overall impression of the workshop day. Your responses will remain anonymous and be collated to inform programme delivery. Data may be reported and/or published in aggregate. Please place your completed questionnaire in the appropriate box at the end of the day.

Many thanks for your help.

1.  

Creativity in improvement

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

2.  

Creativity in improvement

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

3.  

Creativity in improvement

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

4.  

Mental Valleys

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

5.  

Mental Valleys

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

6.  

Mental Valleys

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

7.  

Observation

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

8.  

Observation

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

9.  

Observation

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

10.  

Idea generation

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

11.  

Idea generation

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

12.  

Idea generation

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

13.  

Harvesting Ideas & Prototyping

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

14.  

Harvesting Ideas & Prototyping

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

15.  

Harvesting Ideas & Prototyping

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

16.  

Process Mapping

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

17.  

Process Mapping

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

18.  

Process Mapping

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

19.  

Different Approaches to Process Mapping

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

20.  

Different Approaches to Process Mapping

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

21.  

Different Approaches to Process Mapping

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

22.  

Facilitating a Process Mapping Session

Please rate the relevance of the session content: 

1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (very relevant)

23.  

Facilitating a Process Mapping Session

Please rate how you felt the session was delivered: 

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

24.  

Facilitating a Process Mapping Session

Please rate the pace of the session:

1 (very poor) to 5 (very good)

27.  

How would you rate the value of the content of the workshop day?

28.  

How would you rate the structure of the workshop day? (PowerPoint, exercises, discussions)

Maximum 255 characters

0/255

Thank you for completing the form